The "superiority"
of the nationalisms
in SE
Europe
As with nationalist theories developed in other regions, the same simple
question can be brought forward about our own neighborhood in SE Europe: which
nationalism is superior, that of Albanians, Bulgarians, Greeks, Serbs, "Skopjanomacedonians" or Turks?
In each of the above cases, if not all, most involved declare "superiority"
in front of the others. However, the effectiveness of any such activity depends
on funding, the multitude of members, and (perhaps even more) on the interest
of various local and / or foreign state or sub-state organizations.
However, the above do not have any particular relationship with national
lows, but rather with the designs of each one. Therefore, every side can (and
usually does) display a truth different from the others, which obviously
depends not only on the various interests (as described above) but also on the
credulity of those who are willing to follow the corresponding nationalistic
practices.
But what is most important is that another picture is ultimately derived
from historical truth (internationally accepted) and another one from its
deliberate alteration. The former can be beneficial to every inhabitant of this
planet, the second only for temporary aspirations, acting also as a brake
against the development and prosperity of the world society as a whole. This is
the main reason why this website, as an anti-skid, is stressed to the need of
international reconciliation and solidarity.
Even if, for a moment, Greek nationalism is supposed to be due to
historicity "superior" compared to the others, is it ever possible
for them to accept such a position or as it is natural they would prefer enter
into the logic that this is our problem and not theirs?
KEYWORDS: Albanians, Bulgarians, Greeks, Serbs, Skopjanomacedonians, Turks, Albania, Bulgaria, Greece, Serbia, Skopja, Macedonia, Turkey
ΣΧΟΛΙΑ
ΣΧΟΛΙΑ ΜΕΣΩ Facebook